Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Of trust and childishness

I had some sort of epiphany yesterday.

I was talking with someone who was sharing some terrible things that had happened during his childhood, the type that seems out of a movie involving all sorts of abuse and neglect by his parents and their circle of friends and relatives. He himself was having an epiphany about how much he still wanted to be saved by someone, and the feeling of knowing there was something wrong and not being able to change it because all of his surroundings told him otherwise. I mean, this is a man in his early sixties, who has had a family, and is somewhat successful at what he does.

I often feel that one of the most important things someone can give anyone, but particularly children, is love - yet it is easier said than done. Then there is the question, how many parents were actually held and loved by their own parents? I mean really loved and respected as human beings, games aside. How many parents are mature enough to be parents? There is no instruction manual and even in the most 'loving and caring' of situations, I'm sure things are never perfect. It takes a lot of maturity for anyone to reach this level of loving and caring, children involved or not. And then, there are all these stories of bad abuse, really bad, intentional abuse and neglect, like with the person I was talking to.

We were all children once. We grew up wanting - and needing - to be protected and looked up at adults for that. What happens when the adults are as childish (or more) as the children? What happens when adults haven't found that part inside that is still looking to be protected? What happens when adults are still children in adult bodies?



That's when the light bulb above my head lit up. I suddenly saw this world full of people all sharing this vulnerability inside, manifested and expressed in different forms. We fight with each other, for silly things, we put up our defenses, knowingly or not, because we think someone is going to hurt us, take advantage of us, etc..., we judge ourselves and others, unaware that our judgment says more about us than about the others. At times, particularly the difficult ones, we look around at others trying to find a way, a direction, a hand that will hold us, even someone that will tell us, with all certainty, 'it is going to be ok'. We search for teachers, leaders of all types, that special person that will give us confidence, that one that seems wise and knowledgeable and together. But, who of all people is 'the one', the one that will really lead the way. Is there one?

We look around at others for this protection, this sense that when things are really bad, someone is going to be there to hold us and guide us. .. But who guides them? What guides them? What's going to break the circle of mistrust? We are all vulnerable, there is no one. We share this, no one escapes it. It is part of being human.

Some religions have been very successful at playing this game... and at the end of the day, it is only up to the individual to grow up and mature and find his or her own way, without waiting for someone to save him/her, but at the same time trusting that there is something else, something deep inside to follow, a sense of inner truth and peace - and knowing that we all share this uncertainty.

The issue is not so much what happens as a child, but what of that remains in adulthood. We are to certain extent, as a friend would say, 'blind following the blind...'.

Before I move unto other wordly endeavors I remember the words of Arnaud Desjardins (as quoted by Mariana Caplan) "There is no sin, there is only childishness."

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Disillusionment

I've been away, so many things to write about that I ended up not writing about anything. But, I couldn't avoid this musing.

To be disillusioned, an experience that is as much part of life. You know that feeling when you suddenly realize that things aren't what you thought they were, and a part of you is trying to find something to excuse that which you know deep inside and you haven't been able to accept.

I was talking to a friend recently and after years and years of this person's life being the same, M suddenly realized that the past years were but a mere dream. Suddenly something started to open as a result of having the same feedback over and over again and realizing that there was perhaps more to life. The expectations crumbling to the ground and the understanding that comes with it. To be disillusioned can be such an opportunity to get real about the way we see the world. As unfortunate as it might be, usually disillusionment comes as a result of a shock, or even a traumatic experience (or a repetition of them along the years) that create these openings. It can hurt deeply, but only to the extent that there is no acceptance. It's the lack of acceptance that creates suffering.

Truth can't be cheated... and this can be a relief.

Until next time...

Thursday, August 20, 2009

A clue...

Awakened to the meaning of my heart
That to feel love and oneness is to live
And this the magic of our golden change

Is all the truth I know or seek, O sage!

Savitri - Sri Aurobindo

Thursday, August 13, 2009

... the tragedy continues

A little questionnaire - even if rhetorical - on human relationships

Photo by Jerry Segraves



Respond to the following with all due honesty.

1. How many times when in front of someone else, 'anyone' else do you really show yourself?**

2. Do you run away or hide? Choose one, or both.

3. What's your favorite hiding place:
a. your job
b. your religion
c. your wife, husband, girlfriend, boyfriend, mother, father, daughter, son... any relative
d. your beliefs
e. your political inclination
f. your title
g. all of the above
h. all of the above and more
i. something else
j. ???

4. What's your favorite excuse to run away:
a. I'm too busy (I have to study, work,... - emphasis on the have to)
b. I need to earn money (emphasis on the need to and money)
c. I'm tired, sleepy, sick,
d. I'm fat, tall, skinny, short, ugly, pretty,
e. I'm famous, infamous, powerful, a looser, important, unimportant, flawed, perfect
f. I'm too old, too young, stupid, intelligent,
g. "You are... any (or all of the above)..."
h. I like/dislike _______ (you name it)
i. All of the above
j. All of the above and more
k. Other
l. ???

It's not about the other, and at the same time it is...


** Ok, assuming you really know yourself.

Monday, August 10, 2009

The tragedy of being human...

and its beauty too.





Life is so short. Too short. In a blink of an eye:
civilizations have come and gone,
animal species have become extinct and new ones found,
we are born, we create - and destroy, we eat, sleep, talk - and become quiet, think, remember and forget, we die, others die,
we study, work, socialize, travel,
laugh, cry, enjoy, detest, worry, adore, hate...
generation after generation
changes, changes, changes: technological, historical, social, scientific...

However there is one thing that remains and I feel might be at the center of the tragedy: human relationships.

As I was walking, a nice sunny afternoon - blue skies, flowers smiling and leaves whispering silent secrets, cars passing by (not too fast, not too noisy), the occasional dog barking and the occasional child laughing - a revelation, filled with questions:

at the center of the doing, existing, there is a longing for the other.

Even the most cynical person (I'd say in denial) has this. We all do, all the time. That we forget, that is another thing. All the problems, struggles, sufferings, if sourced deep enough arise from this. Even the doings and convolutions we fall into by living the day by day, most often arise from this.

But the real revelation is that this search for the other, this longing, deep enough is a longing for ourselves, for that part of us that was lost somewhere, some time. A part that is always the same, always constant, perfect and beautiful, although putting nouns to it seems inaccurate.

Who am I? Who are you? Ask yourself this question long enough and you'll see what I mean...

That's the beauty of being human too.

But ssshhh [finger in lips] be quiet and careful, if you are too busy, you might miss it.

Monday, June 22, 2009

Knowing is the first step, or might be just jumping...

Life can be an escape, and I'm almost sure it is for most. Paradoxes...

Photo by Sam Oth


As my blog friend Zac suggests, people do not know what they want. Couldn't agree more. How come?

Ask a little child what they want and most of the time they will answer straightforwardly. They just know. What happens as people grow up? Do the so called responsibilities of life take over? Do they/we forget? Is it because the world suddenly becomes 100 times bigger? What is it?

Something happens... do we loose the wonder of being alive? Do we find that we need to commit and compromise to a thousand other things that have little to do with ourselves? Do we even know ourselves? Do I know myself? Do you know who you really are?

I think part of knowing what you want is knowing who you are. And this knowing is not something mental, something carefully thought and pondered. It is more like an instinct. You just know. Something inside, like a force that wants to be expressed.

I recon part of the issue has to do with fear. Perhaps even unconsciously. That could explain the escaping bit. Because, let's face it... sometimes doing what you want means having the guts to actually do it. And I don't mean here carelessly throwing yourself into selfish actions that will affect others by putting them in danger, but really having the courage of going for what you want and make it work constructively for you and for others.

I really admire people that do this.

This said, sometimes to know who you are, you need to just jump and see. I tend to think that knowing who you are takes a lot more time that knowing what you want. A person is not closed system, there is always interaction with the outside world, they mold each other: a constant play of give and take - a dance.

And then, there's time. You might want something now and ten years down the track that might have changed. What you want is different.

And then, you-I-we die. At least our physical existence. What to escape then?

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

On life...


I've been putting a lot of attention to life. What is this thing called life? What is behind people's intentions and actions, words and dreams? What's behind my own?

I love observing the world around me as much as participating in it. Sometimes detaching myself a little bit helps in getting clarity about me and the rest of the world. It brings focus to the sometimes seemingly chaotic world. I watch people going on with their lives, following their routines, doing what they do. Some look happy, perhaps comfortable. Others look stressed and confused. A lot just seem to do what they do, 'just because'. I often get the sense that a lot of people do what they do not so much because they really want to, but because they are escaping something. A few times I have met people that really enjoy what they do and put themselves fully into it. Something shines with their doing.

Fascinating...

Sunday, May 31, 2009

In between... a quote

I've been busy, wanting to post so many things and finding myself without time for it... So in the meantime here is this quote:

"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious; it is the source of all true art and science."
Einstein

More to come - soon!

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

A thought... on memes and trends

Little thought machines aside, a theory about how thoughts travel is that of memes. A meme, according to the dictionary is a cultural unit (an idea or value or pattern of behavior) that is passed from one generation to another by nongenetic means (as by imitation); "memes are the cultural counterpart of genes".



There is so much to see on this, but for now, my current interest stays in the way trends are carried by groups of people.
It is interesting to notice how trends gain intensity and are adopted or rejected: flows of ideas (and thoughts) that sweep through communities and take root in their lives, becoming the ground for their actions, moods and more ideas. So, from exploring a single thought and how it shapes a person, I am now curious about how groups of thoughts shape societies.

What comes first though? The chicken or the egg?

The more I think of these, the more I feel so tiny, a small bubble in a vast ocean...


Monday, May 18, 2009

My thought, your thought, our thoughts...



There is nothing new under the Sun... they say.

Another cool machine I would like to have is one that color tags the thoughts or has some cool function, like that of spreadsheets that trace the origin of a particular result, in this case of a particular thought. A machine like this would put little lines in the minds of people (from all over the world, from all eras) and bleep, bleep, bleep when it found a thought never thought before. Perhaps I would discover really old thoughts that have been traveling from mind to mind generating actions, moods and other ideas for decades, centuries or millennia. Perhaps it would signal to really original thoughts, never ever thought before, that completely catapult entire civilizations into different directions. Perhaps it would be just a waste of time... as at the end of the day thoughts always come from the outside, don't they?

But since this blog is all about curious musings, I'll entertain the idea a little longer.

I wonder... what was the first thought ever thought? And most importantly, who thought it?

:)

Sunday, May 17, 2009

And another thought...



One of the most fascinating discoveries about thoughts is that when really being aware of them, their origin starts to reveal itself.

I remember the first time I heard someone say that thoughts had forms, my eyes grew bigger and my ears became more attentive.

It is true. Often when I am with someone, and I am quiet enough inside, I can feel their thoughts and I can feel other thoughts enter my consciousness.

This is not new and it is a common experience for people that meditate. Thoughts become tangible things with forms and substance (a different type, not the material one, but a substance in itself). For some it has had such an impact that it has become their ticket to enlightenment.

One such person is Sri Aurobindo, which I often quote in this blog. I guess he was just prepared, because when he sought help on the topic (a long story made very short here) he just got it. Lele, (short for Vishnu Bhaskar Lele), suggested to Sri Aurobindo that he sit three days in solitude and watch his thoughts and that he would notice they came from the outside. On Sri Aurobindo's words:

I did not think either of questioning the truth or the possibility, I simply sat down and did it. In a moment my mind became silent as a windless air on a high mountain summit and then I saw one thought and then another coming in a concrete way from outside; I flung them away before they could enter and take hold of the brain and in three days I was free.

I am a long way from attaining this, but the possibility exists. Ahhh, silence, endless silence...

Have you tried watching your thoughts?

I would love to hear your experiences!

Saturday, May 16, 2009

Another thought on thoughts...

If I was given the choice, I would definitely choose silence versus thoughts.

I remember when I first started meditating, really meditating, it did not take long for something to let go. Before this, there were times when I would be talking to someone and my mind would race at a hundred per hour, thinking incredibly judgmental thoughts, that where totally embarrassing. I would then judge the thoughts, adding extra weight to the internal chaos and hoped that the person in front of me would never guess what I was thinking. Thankfully this is completely gone and I can say there is fresher air to breathe inside my mind.



Another result of meditating was a complete silence. Not just less thoughts, but no thoughts... the lightness that results from that is invaluable and to me it was such a gift. Worries dissolving, a sense of space inside, calm and peaceful, without it being anything in particular really, a sense of fullness. Wow. I admit, however, this is not constant and there are times, still, when raging thoughts take over (in or out of meditation).

So, why ramble on meditation? The more I meditate, the more thoughts become something different... and so does the world around me.

Friday, May 15, 2009

A thought on thoughts...


Have you ever noticed how many thoughts surface inside your mind every hour of every day (of every month of every year of your life)?

After asking myself the question, I decided to do a little research. Apparently a person has between 2000 to 6000 thoughts on average, per day. I think (there goes another thought) it would be great to have a little machine (just for fun) that counts and labels each type of thought. It would be so revealing, not so much to the rest of the world, but to oneself. [Now that I think about it more though, perhaps a prelude to that little machine exists already: Twitter.]

How many of these thoughts are negative thoughts, positive thoughts, neutral thoughts? How do they affect my actions, the actions of others? How much of these are actual helping me accomplish my goals?

Anyway, the fact is that most of us are completely oblivious about what's happening in our minds and that just by bringing a little awareness, the mind actually slows down. I know that for me being conscious of my thoughts has given me a lot of insight on not just myself, but the world around me. At times it takes me by surprise, where did this thought come from? I bet that if someone else could actually hear my thoughts, they would think I smoke pot. (Just in case someone's doubting out there... I don't.) I bet too, I am not alone here.

I have noticed that at times, the thoughts I thought were mine, were not necessarily so. The more I observe thoughts, the more I ask myself, "Where do thoughts come from? What creates thoughts?"

A little food for thought. More to come...

Tuesday, April 28, 2009

To be homeless, a choice?

Before going back to all things disease, something that caught my curiosity recently...

I was walking the streets of a beautiful area in some Northern California city. A beautiful place with cheerful people, lots of trees, blue skies and houses surrounded by varieties of flowering plants. After a day of walking and exploring I was heading towards my temporary abode when highlighted by the dim street lights I could see a couple of people lying in the sidewalk. There was something so out of place in contrast with the beauty of the city, particularly this being a small city. I would expect homeless people sitting/sleeping on the street in New York, in Los Angeles, in Chicago... big cities, but here? Hmmmm, puzzling.

Still puzzled by the question, I asked the owner of my current dwelling about it. He told me that a lot of locals have an active relationship with the homeless, they ask each other about their lives, they give them money, they interact. He was not too happy about it, mainly because he thought that was encouraging them to maintain their homeless status. He kept talking, describing the situation when a question came to mind? Why is it that people in a country where there are so many programs and support, a country that despite the recession, can afford (I'd think) to assist them? I mean, it is not like people in countries like Mexico, Brazil or Peru where the government cannot afford to solve the 'being poor' issue... or is it? Are homeless choosing to be homeless? And if so, what pushes them to be homeless?



Sure, the obvious thing to look at is poverty. It is interesting to note though that the problematic of a country like India would be very different to a place like the US. Still putting things into their context, perhaps homelessness is just a sign of a deeper social problem - whatever that might be. This said, my perception (could be wrong) is that a lot of people in places like the US would be people that either had a career or a job once in their life in comparison to someone that is homeless in some country in Latin America, where the levels of education are so different.

Talking later to a friend he stated that most of these homeless people aren't there because they have chosen to be there but because they have some sort of mental illness or have a heavy addiction to substance abuse that makes it blurry for them to distinguish between living in the streets and living elsewhere. That would explain why one of the people I saw was using a key to scratch his leg so deeply and anxiously that blood was coming out.

A few days later, I was invited to a movie night. The movie is called 'The Soloist' and it's about the relationship that emerges between a journalist and a homeless talented musician that drops out of Juilliard because of a mental disability. This added to the hypothesis that some homeless people do choose (some way or another) to live on the streets and refuse help that would mean changing their lifestyle.

However, that is probably not the case with every one. Some people do fall into the circle of poverty and can't get out of it.

Would love to hear other people's thoughts on the topic...

---

Some statistics on homeless people:

- In 2005, an estimated 100 million people worldwide were homeless.[1]

- Between 150,000 and 200,000 individuals with schizophrenia or manic-depressive illness are homeless among the 744,000 homeless population (total homeless population statistic based on data from a 2005 national survey). These 150,000–200,000 individuals are equivalent to the population of such cities as Dayton, Ohio; Des Moines, Iowa; Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Grand Rapids, Michigan; Providence, Rhode Island; Richmond, Virginia; or Salt Lake City, Utah. [2]

More statistics and information:

National Coalition for the Homeless

Homeless Statistics



[1] From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homelessness#Contributing_causes_of_homelessness
[2] From: http://www.psychlaws.org/generalResources/fact11.htm

Saturday, April 25, 2009

More on viruses... resources

Something about viruses that makes them quite interesting is how they can only survive when there are cells they can infect. They cannot live on their own and so survive through using cells of living organisms. This makes them so powerful because they attack the fundamental structure of a human body: the cells.

Some great resources and articles on the topic:


Virus or Parasite


An article on how much humans are compared to viruses and the promise of it becoming instead a symbiotic parasite.

Even Viruses Catch Viruses

Aha! Fierce fight of the most apt.

Viruses, the Unknown Frontier

A high school student's still to come research on viruses. Useful on its simplicity to explain what a virus is and how it reproduces.

And of course... wikipedia on viruses, cytokine storm, influenza

Friday, April 24, 2009

What moves viruses?

How fascinating...

I was reading about the outbreak of swine flu in Mexico and how 'experts' fear it becoming a pandemic. Will it?

I find the topic of viruses and bacteria (micro organisms in general) so interesting. How is it that they infect some while not others? What makes someone prone to infection? What is the interaction between these and the cells in the body?

Adenovirus, from wikimedia commons

Sure, these questions can be answered from the medical perspective, but I want to go beyond these answers. For example, I was reading about the etymology of the word Influenza. Wikipedia says:

"The word Influenza comes from the Italian language and refers to the cause of the disease; initially, this ascribed illness to unfavorable astrological influences. Changes in medical thought led to its modification to influenza del freddo, meaning "influence of the cold". The word influenza was first used in English in 1743 when it was adopted, with an anglicized pronunciation, during an outbreak of the disease in Europe...."

This is where things start to become interesting. It says that the original word captured the cause of the disease as the result of 'unfavorable astrological influences'. Did I just read 'astrological influences'? [Smile.]

In the past I used to think that getting sick as a result of a viral influence was like having something parasitic come into my system and lodge there. Like a piece of dirt that can be removed with proper disinfectants. However my views have changed over the years. Sure, a virus is something that infects the body and, when it overpowers the balance systems in the body a person becomes sick. However I couldn't say that a virus is just an 'organism' [1] that comes and stays. Most viruses are highly contagious. The survival fight they launch is fierce. Their power is not necessarily individual but as a group. When they start to infect and replicate they can decimate large populations of people. There are forces behind these little buggers. And these forces are usually quite sharp and intense. In fact, if you have a close look at them, they are only made of information [2]. Look at some of their shapes... they carry something. Some even are extremely beautiful: geometrical forms so tiny and 'perfect', ever ready to attack and infect.

It has been my perception that outbreaks like the one in Mexico are often a sign of something else. Some sort of force (and here, please avoid interpreting my words with some tint of paranoia). I think there is much more to see about viruses and their 'power' than what has been explored so far. What moves these forces behind virus outbreaks? What makes certain people more prone to be infected than other people? Not all viruses infect everyone and maybe these predispositions can hint some answers as much as the fact that there could be astrological forces linked to these outbreaks. After all, despite scientific skepticism, astrology was considered an important influence in many, many ancient traditions - that have shaped what we are today. [3]

Virus are moved by forces that interact with our physical bodies. They can change and modify them through their infection, to the point that malformations and growths can occur. Have a look - if you have the belly for it - at this man's hands and feet infected with the human papilloma virus. Who needs genetic engineers when there are viruses to do the job?

Perhaps that is what Sri Aurobindo meant in the quote I last posted and as long as every cell in the body stops responding to 'whatever forces' except the One Force, then we are all prone to becoming sick.

The question remains, what force is behind this outbreak in Mexico? (Or any other outbreak for that matter...)

[1] The idea of viruses being organisms is still debated as they don't have the ability to metabolize food and lack their own cellular structure.
[2] Comparing the action of computer viruses to 'biological' viruses can be quite interesting from this perspective.
[3] I tend to believe that in the not so distant future astrology will be re-considered as an important source of information for some of these so called skeptics.

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Sri Aurobindo on illness

A quote:

"The human body has always been in the habit of answering to whatever forces chose to lay hands on it and illness is the price it pays for its inertia and ignorance. It has to learn to answer to the one Force alone."

Something to aspire too. Definitely.

Monday, April 20, 2009

The universe inside - thoughts and emotions aside


I've been a little sick. Nothing too important, but a hassle when you are traveling, which I have been. Suddenly there is no energy to do what you want and your body claims rest, rest, rest.

On the other hand this has become such an opportunity and a fascinating way of delving into the physical body. The sense that there is something in the body trying to work out itself, trying to come back to balance. A fight that goes on between the good little bits and the not so good ones.

There is so much to see in regards to the physical body. Most of it remains unseen, unnoticed.

Isn't it amazing that all the time there is something going on inside us - thoughts and emotions aside? There is something happening to every single person in this planet: all these interactions happening in our cells to hold some structure that allow us to think that we are individuals... And we are vaguely aware of it. We go on, doing our thing, living our lives and these systems working their magic in the background. Unless something goes wrong, we don't have to think about how to breathe, how to send the air to the lungs and then tell the blood how to extract the CO2; we don't have to think about extracting the nutrients from our food (if any) and send them around to be optimized; we don't have to tell our left leg 'move after the right', so we can walk....

It's just amazing. There is a universe happening inside every second. Movements in all sorts of ways doing all sorts of things with such precision (most of the time) and wisdom. How is this possible?

Wow.

Monday, April 13, 2009

The five senses - part five

My last observation - for now - on the topic has to do with a question.

Which of the five is the most refined?

I found this quote by Robert Delaunay, a French painter labeled as Orphist:

"The eye is the most refined of our senses, the one which communicates most directly with our mind, our consciousness."

I am not sure I agree here. His paintings, for example are almost musical. Interesting that his work was called "Orphic cubism", being Orpheus son of the god Apollo (in Greek mythology - a fascinating tale, btw) and a fantastic poet and musician, who perfected the lyre created by Hermes.

Rhythm, Joie de Vivre

Seeing Delaunay's work is as if he was perceiving visuals as sounds. Which makes me think of synaesthesia.

Synaesthesia is the ability for the senses to be mixed up in the brain, producing for example the perception of a sound as a smell, taste as touch, visuals as sound... or you name the combination. It is often present in artists and people that meditate a lot. Notice that I called it an ability and not something that's wrong with a person - modern psychology labels this phenomena as some sort of problem (sigh). It allows you to perceive your environment in a very deep and fascinating way, making it not just more alive, but also more rich and 'informational'.

So, in not agreeing with Delaunay, I would say that sound is the most refined of all senses. Why, because sound is one of those things that can become very, very abstract. Just think of the connection between music and mathematics...pretty abstract. The fact of not being completely aware of what is happening with the sense of hearing doesn't make it less refined than seeing.

A bit of a digression... Maybe the question here is what is my parameter to call something more refined? What makes something more or less refined? To me something refined has the ability for abstraction and a high level precision. So refined, in this context would equate with precision and abstraction.

Considering the above I'd say that a sound (coming from the external environment) could take someone deeper and higher into abstraction, out of their mind (ordinary mind: the gross block, the blahblahblah), closer to Reality than visuals (coming from the external environment). Since the five senses have to do with the information coming from the outside, I'd insist on saying that the sense of hearing is the most refined of them all.

But, that is just me... what do you think?

Thursday, April 9, 2009

The five senses - part four

There is a paradox with the senses.

The senses are the ones that take people out of themselves and into the world. In meditation, for example, if one wants to go deeply and feel oneSelf, the less external stimuli from the outside, the better. I guess that's why in the past some hard core meditators would go into caves and why in the present real meditation means sitting in a silent place as to be able to go deep inside. This means no smells, no sounds, no movement. Stillness and silence.

Then, think of people incapable of feeling. Their minds are usually overactive, very, very noisy. You can almost feel the movements of their thoughts... it is painful. People like this are usually stressed, find it difficult to deeply relax and stay still. More often than not, people like this don't notice the birds sing, the smell of a rose, the sound of a faraway bell, the feeling of the wind caressing their face or how uncomfortable wearing certain synthetic clothes can be. I suppose this is a good thing, if, for example, we were locked in some torture chamber. In this case the mind would be a safe place to escape.

But back to the paradox, to counteract an overly active mind, the remedy would be to feel. Feel, feel, feel... don't run away, feel. Feel the wind, feel the floor you are walking on, feel your shoes... feel the flavor of that tasty (or disgusting) meal you are eating. Feel the sight of the waves crashing in the shore.
Feel what the world does to you, what all these stimuli is perceived by your body and how it makes you feel good or bad, or neutral. Feeling the world can be such a tool, particularly when we can disconnect the judgment and just feel. A tool for what? A tool to be more present.

Think about people that are depressed and unhappy. Most of the times their senses are numb. They have forgotten to feel. Just feel.


Photo by Tiago Fioreze

So, where's the paradox here? Well, when it comes to getting in touch with deeper aspects of oneself, the mind, not the senses, is the one that blocks the process. The senses are those things that take you out of yourself, but only through being aware of them, it is possible to go deeper inside, into the big Silence, far away from the stimuli of the world and into our real Selves.

Try it! Make an intention to feel your environment and see what happens. Do it for a few days, from morning to night... And if you do, let me know how you go. Would love to read your comments.

Wednesday, April 8, 2009

The five senses - part three


Photo from Wikimedia

A very interesting and beautiful experiment was held recently by The Washington Post in which they asked a well known violinist to play, pretending to be a as street musician, in a Metro station during rush hour.

The music is sublime and the article is beautifully written; the results quite interesting. It says a lot about how much people are really present:

Pearls before breakfast

Talk about feeling...

The five senses - part two

It is well know that sometimes when one of the senses is not functioning properly, other senses take over, becoming more sensitive. Someone that's visually impaired could perhaps be able through touch, sound and smell to recognize details of the environment that not even people with 20/20 vision can.


Photo from wikimedia

The senses are our main source of information when it comes to interacting with the world. If we were not able to see, feel, smell, taste or hear, then how would we know what is happening around us? If we were not able to know what is happening around us, then how would we respond?

Let's imagine a little experiment. Let's suppose we had a funky gadget that would shut off, one by one, our senses for a few days:

hearing -- gone
smells -- gone
visuals -- gone
touch and all sensory perceptions -- gone
taste -- gone

What do you think would happen?

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

What's one thing that without it people wouldn't be able to interact with their environment?

Actually it is not one, it's five: the senses.

I was walking yesterday trying to figure where an annoying sound was coming from. I first thought it was coming from one direction, but further tuning in showed the origin of that sound. My mind almost instantly imagined the device that could cause such an itchy noise.

This lead to another insight. Somehow I realized that because of the walls surrounding the place I was in, I could not see where the sound was coming from... of course I could not taste, smell nor touch it, either, which couldn't give me any more information on the source. Further into philosophizing about the topic I realized that of all senses hearing and the sense of smell are the ones that can locate things coming from further away. On the other hand touch and taste the ones that are more short range.

Photo from Wikimedia

Amazing what little attention does to our interactions with the world. How many people are actually aware, consciously aware of all the stimuli that the world is offering ALL the time. Maybe this point is the reason why so many aren't (aware). There is soooo much of it: sounds, smells, tastes, sensations, and unless you can't use your eyes, visuals. It's like a little machine working all the time (perhaps except while asleep), feeling, feeling, feeling. No wonder why some people are unable to feel... could it be too much?

I mean, some people just switch off and live automatically. Their minds are overly active, disconnecting the feeling. It's as if there was a little command that said... too much information, just grab what it is important and let go of the rest. But, what is important?

Have you seen people on rush hour... they barely look alive, you can feel their minds (ok, I've been there too) moving at the speed of light... blahblahblah... There's a world out there and most people barely notice... it's all in their heads!

Monday, April 6, 2009

In a true aspiration to not succumb...

towards criticizing the affairs of our contemporary world I was trying to find a logical explanation, something that would explain what is happening to the sanity of the world. Suddenly this note found its way to me:

UK launches massive, one-year program to archive every email

Ok, I calm down, breathe deeply and think "well, I am sure their intentions are well meaning and are doing so in case a problem arises". "As the article says they have been able to find criminals as a result of this measure." Still... my other side won this argument: "Really? Is this a good thing?" I doubt it.

Isn't this a bit too much? Is this the beginning of a world where every movement is monitored by the government? Isn't the government also made of people? Who decides this sort of thing? Are people, the citizens even consulted about these measures?

I am baffled and I don't even live there myself... It reminds me of those great science fiction books like 1984 and A Brave New World.

Glad to read that Sweden, for example, "is reportedly ignoring the rule completely". Maybe in the future this will be some sort haven for those lost souls wanting freedom...

Big, long sigh.


Is the world going crazier...

or is it just me?

I was browsing through the newspaper this morning. A quick recap:

- Allergies on the rise (to food, environment...)
- Complaints about government systems that promise to be great but are a hassle in practice
- North Korea launching a missile, but most importantly the controversy that this has generated
- Somali pirates and their successful activities
- Women in Vietnam sold to men in other Asian countries to be married (against their will)
and it goes on and on...

So sure, I am posting only those that aren't too positive, from my point of view. However, I ask myself: do people in the past lived to this level of craziness? or is that we just become informed more easily?


Photo from Wikimedia

My sense is that both. Telecommunications have made it easier to know what's happening on the other side of the world, but also, my perception is that people are loosing it more (perhaps for the same reason).

I really think that the level of craziness is going to go up and up in the coming years (for good and not so good). We shall see...

What do you think?

Thursday, April 2, 2009

The role of the media: facts or fiction? Five facts.

I've been following the war on drugs happening in Mexico very closely through the media. Through TV and newspapers there is a sense of Mexico becoming like a war zone... people dying everyday, innocent people killed for no reason, the picture of another Afghanistan... and I found this:

Mexico: The elusive truth about safety

What a breath of fresh air!

While pondering on this, I realized the media instead of informing and presenting facts, just follows hidden (and not so hidden) agendas that have to do little with reality. I was asking myself (and others) when did this happen? When did the media became some 'institution' that serves purposes other than what it was intended to do? Aren't newspapers, reporters, news shows, supposed to relate the facts?

Just look at the economic crisis in the US. Some TV shows reported that it was going to be the worst depression ever and that people should be ready for all sort of catastrophes. A favorite on the topic is this:

Glenn's Beck War Room


A few things come to mind.

1. Facts can be put in a certain order to manipulate the message.
2. Some media 'outlets' do serve certain agendas. If you dig a bit further and not believe everything you hear or read, it is easy to spot them. Just get a few different newspapers (if possible from around the world) and watch different news shows commenting on the same topic and you'll get a more realistic picture.
3. However don't stay with that... sometimes (if possible) talk to people (like in the case of Mexico's violence situation) and get their sense of what is really happening on the ground.
The internet has great resources that present testimonies from actual pictures.
4. Ask yourself questions about what you read (including this blog).

5. If all else fails, turn everything off and down, breath deeply or go and have a bath... :) After all the world will keep going with its craziness and stressing yourself about it won't make it any better.


photo courtesy of wikimedia.org

A note: when I talk about media here I refer to news media, as it is quite obvious that the media in general does have an agenda.

Sunday, March 29, 2009

Sixth sensing your environment with technology

I recently received a link to this video on ted.com and I decided to post it here.

There was a time in my life when I was addicted to science fiction. I devoured most of the usual books on the topic, a classic one being the Foundation series of Asimov. Science fiction fed a part of me that is not too easy to satiate.

Nowadays there are sooo many cool things being developed that were just hints in those books. Some which are probably not too public yet. This video shows one of many gadgets that exemplify how virtual realities are going to interact more with real reality. It's really cool.

It's called sixthsense and it is a device (mix of mobile device, camera, mirror and projector) that gives you more information of real objects through hand gestures.




Also check
Pranav Mistry's website (one of the developers). He has other really interesting projects.

Thinking about technologies in the next 10 years just blow my mind. Just imagine what the combination of nanotechnology, artificial intelligence and genetic engineering can create (for good or not so good). The world as we know it promises to be a very, very different place not too far from today.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

This moment's quote...

In order to arrive at what you do not know you must go by the way which is the way of ignorance.
T.S. Elliot

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Some mental floss for the soul...

Where have I been?

Perhaps it is the new moon (they are always good for beginnings...) or perhaps just a matter of grace, but I just found this website. Smart fun...

Loved this video:

How to Destroy Civilization with Nanotechnology



Ransom Riggs, you go boy...

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Dan-de-lion...

I was introduced to this delicious alternative to coffee on a trip to Australia.

Dandelion tea!



I like the flavor of this in particular, but it has lactose, so might not be an option for some people. There are many brands and presentations you can buy, or you could grow some of your own (it's considered a pest for so many).

Not only it has a toasty flavor, but it is good for the liver and many other things:

"Diuretic, tonic and slightly aperient. It is a general stimulant to the system, but especially to the urinary organs, and is chiefly used in kidney and liver disorders."

(botanical.com)

"Dandelions are also good for the bladder, spleen, pancreas, stomach and intestines. It’s recommended for stressed-out, internally sluggish, and sedentary people. Anyone who's a victim of excessive fat, white flour, and concentrated sweeteners could benefit from a daily cup of dandelion tea."

(wildmanstevebrill.com)


"Actions: diuretic, laxative, choleretic, tonic, stomachic, antioxidant, hepatic, alterative, aperient, anti-inflammatory, cholagogue"

(herbsarespecial.com.au)


"Dandelion tea, whether made from the root or the leaves, makes a great tonic, because it stimulates the body to eliminate waste and toxins. Because the leaves are rich in readily available magnesium, dandelion is a great herb for improving bone health. Magnesium increases bone density, so dandelions may actually help to prevent bone disorders such as osteoporosis."

(safealternativemedicine.co.uk
)

"The leaves contain several vitamins and minerals to promote well-being. Dandelion leaves contains more beta-carotene than carrots, which is important for improving a person's ability to see in dim light. The leaves contain iron, calcium, potassium, phosphorus, magnesium and zinc, as well as vitamins B-1, B-2, B-5, B-6, B-12, C, D, E, and P.
Due to the existence of vitamin E, dandelion tea can be used to alleviate skin complaints. Vitamin E can help encourage the growth of body issue and protects cells from damage, therefore promoting healing and reducing scarring."

(teainfusion.com)

You can read a full list of properties here too.

My experience:

I drink a cup every now and then after meals. It simply makes me feel good.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Iboga, the miracle hallucinogen?

A few weeks ago, navigating through the web (while researching raw food retreats), I accidentally ran into this.

I used to be a fan of Carlos Castaneda. I read ALL of his books and the books of Taisha Abelar and Florinda Donner, bought the Tensegrity videos and practiced them on my own (for a few months). Anything that mentioned him or Don Juan became a magnet to my interest. (Then life took another course... another story.)

Back then I was very curious about trying peyote or mushrooms or some sort of hallucinogen. I never tried them (am actually happy I did not). This led me to read about these substances and their effects. Nowadays I keep hearing about people going into a ayahuasca retreats or the use of similar substances with the purpose of getting to know themselves deeply, but I had never heard of iboga.

According to several sources, iboga is a shrub originaly used in Africa by the Bwiti (a religious group) for spiritual and medical reasons. Its main ingredient, ibogaine, was accidentally found responsible for removing withdrawal symptoms and cravings from chemical addictions.

I know people whose lives have been completely ruined because of addiction to drugs and alcohol, people that have tried and tried but keep failing to completely let go. Letting go is not easy for most of them and the effects of stopping using such substances can be deathly. Alcohol, for example is one of those substances, more so than drugs.

So reading about Ibogaine, a substance that is prohibited in the US, but widely researched in other countries, opened my eyes to a new alternative. Research has showed that it:

- alleviates 90% of withdrawal symptoms

- addresses cravings for two to six months

- changes habitual thought patterns

- helps restore proper functioning of the brain's neurochemistry

- is non-addictive and needs not be taken on a continuing basis

(from 'awakeninginthedream.com')


There are plenty of youtube videos and material available online. This is just one of them:



It does sound like a miracle plant.

I wonder how many things can be found in nature whose true healing properties are yet to be discovered (or perhaps forgotten).

Sunday, March 22, 2009

More on diets... and gaining weight.



One of the many things that call my fascination is the issue of weight loss/gain. There are many, many aspects to these. From the image related ones to the health related ones, going through psychological, cultural, etc. etc.

I am not an expert on the topic. However, it is interesting that the research I have done usually brings more information on suggestions and ideas for people wanting to loose weight, not gain it. Have you ever talked to someone that wants to actually gain weight? They would tell you that it is very, very difficult. Some have attempted to eat all day (in fact some do eat quite a lot) but they just cannot gain weight.

So this post has my total support for them, not the weight loosers. Must say, though, I wonder if the key for both is the same. By accident I found a comment on a you tube video that mentioned some system (they didn't talk about the specifics) that helped people loose weight through working directly with the hypothalamus.

This is totally new for me (although it is pretty obvious when you look at it closer). The hypothalamus is the one that regulates some functions related to metabolism and the Autonomic Nervous System. In relation to weight, it sets the 'program' that specifies the 'normal' weight for that person (whatever that may be, even if it does not seem 'normal' nor 'healthy').

I was reading wikipedia (which, yes I admit is the basic of basics, but can give a general idea on something). It says the following:

The hypothalamus is responsible for certain metabolic processes and other activities of the Autonomic Nervous System. It synthesizes and secretes neurohormones, often called hypothalamic-releasing hormones, and these in turn stimulate or inhibit the secretion of pituitary hormones. The hypothalamus controls body temperature, hunger, thirst, [1] fatigue, anger, and circadian cycles.

The hypothalamus is a complex region in the brain of humans, and even small nuclei within the hypothalamus are involved in many different functions. The paraventricular nucleus for instance contains oxytocin and vasopressin (also called antidiuretic hormone) neurons which project to the posterior pituitary, but also contains neurons that regulate ACTH and TSH secretion (which project to the anterior pituitary), gastric reflexes, maternal behavior, blood pressure, feeding, immune responses, and temperature.


As I said before, I know very little about the topic, which seems immense, so I will post some open questions that perhaps will seem odd, but might bring some clarity in the future.

The questions come from thinking about a person I met recently, and linking this person's case to other people I have seen that cannot gain weight. They also arise from combining my interests in astrology and emotional issues and my general interest in people's issues. Some, however, are just questions to which I would have to write a whole treatise if I wanted to explain how I came up with them.

I'll call the person in this case 'FB'. FB is someone that cannot put on weight. FB is usually hungry and eats quite often, not limiting the diet, except for red meat, which only is included very rarely.
When talking to FB, a single woman in her 30s, other possible clues come to the surface. She mentions that she doesn't have a good relationship with her mother and that she has trouble sleeping at nights. She also says that she often has trouble digesting food and that she feels tired despite taking a nap in the afternoons.

From an astrology perspective, an astrological influence that seem to jump out is the moon. The moon has to do with nurturing (this includes food), the mother, and deep rest and letting go.

Now thinking about another couple of cases (one of them a man), they also had issues related with their mothers. In his case, his mother died when he was young, leading to deep grief and loss. In her case her mother was absent through her childhood due to work.

So, my questions:

- could there be a relationship between the hypothalamus and the moon astrological force?
- is it possible that by working out the mother issues these people carry, their weight would go up?
- what is really happening in the hypothalamus of these people or people like them?
- what could be done in the hypothalamus to change and influence a different 'normal' weight and a metabolic balance that will target their perfect weight?
- could genetics be the main factor here?

Suddenly I am fascinated with the hypothalamus.

Perhaps someone with more knowledge will read this one day and point to something that might be a key to solving the issue of weight gain or loss in this case.

Friday, March 20, 2009

On accidents, skiing and Natasha Richardson

I confess.

I am not a Hollywood follower. I like movies, all sorts, but I find the fanaticism towards actors/actresses and public people is a bit too much.

Why? Probably because I feel they are just people, like you, me, and, unless you are in a deserted island (I'm not), our neighbors. Sure, some public figures are very, very talented and I always welcome inspiration from talented people. But to put some other human being on a pedestal is not quite right.

Anyway, the only reason I am talking about this is because I have been almost obliged to follow the accident/death of Natasha Richardson through yahoo news. Have you ever noticed how intelligent their titles are? They pull you into reading things that you did not know interest you. Ok, I am drifting again...

Back to topic. Apparently Richardson's death resulted from her falling on a beginners slope in some ski resort in Canada. She did not die immediately. She went off to her room as if nothing much and started having a headache. She was then taken to the hospital in Canada and then transferred to NY, but it was too late. Later, the autopsy showed her brain was swelling from the injury. Condolences to the family and friends.

When I read the whole story I felt a reminder of how much life can be such a delicate thing.

A few weeks ago I was skiing after many, many (MANY) years of absence into the sport. I was excited but also noticed some fear... What if I fall and get injured?

I started with the beginners slope. After the third time and a little confidence I went unto the next level (still beginners I would say). I kept going until I went to the most difficult gray slope. All in all I fell three times. Two of them feeling my whole body twisting.

Two interesting things I noticed where. One, the fear never really went away (I assume the falls were a result of this) and two, falling was not that bad. In fact it was fun and I felt as if I had landed in the softest cushion. It was the trying to get up that was hard.

The next day I was expecting to feel all bruised. Not one single pain. Eyebrows raised.

So... reading about Richardson's death and then comparing it to my skiing experience, it seems surreal. All these questions. All these little seemingly innocuous accidents that happen all the time. What is it that for some it means a final good bye, and for others just a bad moment?

I guess there is no answer. Or at least not one that doesn't involve some esoteric insight.

Life... such a delicate thing it is, indeed. There's mystery in life.

May her journey be safe and clear.

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Are you at your best being raw?

A quick side note to raw foods (or any type of 'diet').

I have to say though that, after reading and reading about raw foods, I am still not convinced on their long term benefit. I will definitely choose from these and have initiated conversations with some of them, but my intention is to find a short term detox solution and perhaps do it periodically. An interesting website to read is:
http://www.beyondveg.com. It explores some of the ideas behind being vegetarian or vegan. It also takes me back to my original thought that diet is something very, very personal and that the best way to decide what you need is to tune into your body. However, this can be tricky as people might be completely pulled to certain types of diets because of their conditioning.


I'm not in pro of dogmas, whatever form or shape they have. To me life is much more than a set of fixed ideas.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Raw foods retreats

These are some resources, available online. I found some of these very interesting and appealing. There is a whole range from only classes to full retreats with services and therapies as part of their program. I feel that if I were to do something like this I'd probably go for the full thing and experience it on a retreat setting. The more beautiful the place the better. However there are programs for all types of people, ranging from very serious, medically based ones to programs in which people share their personal healing experiences resulting from living a raw food lifestyle.

The list:

USA

ARIZONA

http://www.treeoflife.nu/

This is a community centered around a Dr. called
Rebbe Gabriel Cousens. They offer different programs and options with a spiritual focus. I can't fully comment on something I haven't experienced myself, but this seems a little new agey for me.


CALIFORNIA

http://www.therawretreat.com

The place looks very beautiful and what they offer seems interesting, but the website seems out of date. It is also focused on individual needs and not for groups.


http://jinjee1.securesites.net/retreat/

This place is still under construction. The place also looks beautiful in a different way. The owners/developers seem to be very convinced about the benefits of raw foods and they have build a whole website with pictures to prove it.



PUERTO RICO
http://www.annwigmore.org/

Also based on Dr. Ann Wigmore's ideas (and they make sure you know it), who according to the website spent time there teaching, when she was not in Boston (or elsewhere). They don't have retreat facilities, but you can stay at nearby apartments and hotels. They are close to the sea. Their focus is educational as they are not 'a spa nor clinic'.

FLORIDA

http://www.hippocratesinst.org/

This is a fully fledged program, probably the most professional. They have spa services and intensive workshops leading to certification. The original Ann Wigmore's school. If I were serious about raw foods, I'd probably give this one a chance.

http://rawfoodsretreat.com

This is more of a luxury type, personal retreat place. Things get organized around the individual needs.

http://www.circle-of-life.net/

They offer individualized programs in Florida as well as group retreats in other parts of the world. They focus too on juice fasts. The Florida programs do not offer accommodation as part of the retreat.


GEORGIA

http://www.livingfoodsinstitute.com


The owner/teacher seems very upbeat and willing to teach anyone. Her transition into raw foods was due to an illness. This is also mostly educational (although she offers therapies and treatments - colonics, reflexology, Bach flowers, etc) as part of the program. People stay at hotels or nearby homes as she does not provide retreat facilities. Her prices are a bit higher, but she offers different packages to match different budgets.

HAWAII

http://www.vacationinnparadise.com

They provide you with everything so you can do it yourself.


ILLINOIS

http://www.naturesrawenergy.com

Five and 12 days detox retreats based on classes. Their prices seem to be affordable and include room and board and classes.
Based on Dr. Ann Wigmore's ideas.


MICHIGAN

http://www.creativehealthinstitute.com

Based on Ann Wigmore, they offer teaching retreats and support afterwards.


NEW MEXICO

http://www.wigmore.org/

Very secluded. Also based on Ann Wigmore's philosophy.

PENNSYLVANIA

http://www.purejeevan.com/

Individual guidance with raw foods or some group retreats done in a separate place.


TENNESSEE

http://www.serenitycove.com/

Also focused on individual needs. The owner offers other services. One that promised interesting results was a massage based therapy called chi nei tsang.


TEXAS

http://www.roylretreat.com/

They are closed at the moment, but including it since they seem serious enough.

WASHINGTON

http://www.cedarsprings.org
/

The are looks beautiful, probably close to Canada. They make emphasis on the weight loss aspect of eating raw foods. They also have programs with horses.

OTHER:

http://www.optimumhealth.org/

They have two places one in San Diego and one in Austin. They hold full retreats, but focused on teaching, not on spa therapies. Their philosophy is Christian based.


OUTSIDE THE US:

AUSTRALIA

http://www.alivefoods.com/

They offer detox retreats on a yatch and other similar classes (not specific to raw foods).


BELIZE

http://www.vidaclara.com/

They offer water fasting, raw food retreats and Natural Hygiene programs, in beautiful lush surroundings. The retreats are individual with the support of one of the owners, Dr. Sniadach who offers personal support and assistance.


COSTA RICA

http://www.pachamama.com

They are a community based on Osho principles and practices. They offer raw detox as part of one of their longer workshops. The place looks beautiful.

http://www.waterfallvillas.com

They are not specifically raw food oriented. It is more like a spa retreat where they also have raw foods.

PANAMA

http://www.tanglewoodwellnesscenter.com/

Their specialty seems to be water fasting. Not my piece of cake, but perhaps some people will find it interesting.

THAILAND

http://www.dharmahealingintl.com/

Their program is a spiritual in nature and includes raw foods. These are some of the activities they advertise as part of their program: Meditation, Yoga, Qi Kung, Water Exercise, Raw Food Preparation, Spiritual Nutrition, Vibrational Sound Healing, Dharma Talk, Kundalini Colonic-Acupressure, an Iridology reading and personal psycho/spiritual counseling. Might be a good option if you can afford the trip to Thailand.


UK

http://www.livingfoods.co.uk/

Their focus is day in day out. They offer courses, consultation and practitioner trainings.

http://www.suradetox.com/

They seem to know what they are doing. Their retreats are for 7 days in countryside UK. They put emphasis on colonics and they have a lot of information about them on the website.

---

If anyone reading this has any suggestions or comments regarding the above, please share!

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Money, money, money...

Another topic that´s to come.

Most people are so blinded by money. Money after all is a force, and those who know how to handle it are not many. I think in fact a lot of people, even those succeeding at playing the money game, are handled by this force, not the opposite.

Anyway... more to come.

Raw food resource list coming... in the meantime:

I wish there was an invention that could translate your thoughts automatically into written words.


So many things to write about, yet so little time.


I have no doubt that such invention is coming. In fact future inventions is another subject I like. Some of these inventions are going to completely change the world as we know it. For good or bad.


Just imagine nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, genetic engineering (and the whole stem cell research happening)... wow. But this is another topic.


Back soon.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Food, health and freedom

Food is one of those things that most people tend to underestimate. It is so much part of being human that we either give it too much importance or completely neglect it.

Throughout my life I have been changing my diet. As a teenager I would eat anything, (including lots of chocolates) and I would gain or loose weight accordingly. I think I ate a bit too much though.
Later in life I became vegetarian (only cheese and eggs included), then I changed to the blood type diet (according to which I was incidentally supposed to be vegetarian) and so on.

With all these said, there have been times when I am so immersed in whatever I am doing that I completely forget to eat. There have also been times when I have found eating such a weird experience. A particular time I remember, working in a company that had a dining room for their employees, I sat there with my selection of food and looked around the room. Everyone was munching away, sharing stories (or gossip) and I thought 'how strange this is that we humans have to put some foreign matter into this thing called mouth to be able to live'. Bizarre.

As time passed by. I lost quite some weight and muscle (probably as a result of lack of exercise). Weight that I have not been able to put on. I decided to go back to eating protein. I started with chicken and fish and every now and then sea food (it was too strong for my palate). Red meat has not been an option, unless I really, really crave it, which is almost never.

The thing is, food is a vital part of inhabiting a human body (unless you are an ultra advanced yogi). However as time has passed I realized that instead of following some external diet, I need to tune into my body and see what it needs. This way it is possible to eat whatever one wants instead of following a set of external rules. The problem with this approach for some people is that they are so out of tune with it, that it is almost impossible to know what is the best thing to eat.

A question I ask myself often is, what would it take to be free of the food slavery. My answer to this has been, let the body eat what it needs. Freedom... !

Lately I have been exploring the idea of trying the raw foods diet, despite the fact that Ayurvedic doctors have advised me to eat cooked food. So in the process of deciding if this is something my body needs/wants I have been exploring what is available on the net. My main intention is to do a thorough detox as I feel I have accumulated all sorts of things that are not supporting my body's well being.

A list of resources to come.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Everything's Amazing, Nobody's Happy - OK I AM.

I was watching today the already old video where Conan O´Brien interviews Louis CK

It is so true! Most of us have adapted so fast to all things technological. Earlier today my internet connection dropped and although I was not cursing and screaming, it was a nuisance. We - most of us - have gotten used to these things. We expect them to work and do it well and fast. How frustrating can it be when you are wanting to work and have 3, 4 tabs open and the connection is taking aaaages. We want things faster and better, ALL the time.

We have lost wonder for these things.

Technology changes at such a fast pace that not much makes our eyes open wide. We expect for improvements all the time. Only totally unthinkable new inventions surprise us - sometimes. How many times do we get to think about how things work? How many things had to happen for me to be able to sit here and write this post:

discoveries and inventions like electricity, telephones, radio waves, microchips, keyboards and screens, an alphabet thats comprehensive by most, blogs... not to mention having the privilege of being in a country were there is peace, where I do not have to worry first about what I am going to eat today, being healthy, having a somewhat coherent mind, and so on...

It is AMAZING and I speak for myself here, AND I am happy. [At least right now.]

Sunday, March 8, 2009

On religions and spirituality...


One last comment before attempting to move on.

It is sad to see that many religious people, that follow the dogmas of their 'faith', miss the point completely. I have friends that grew up, as I did, breathing the Catholic influence. Some of them pretend, like those people I used to look up to at church, to be very religious and in touch with God. Yet, they are highly judgmental of anything that is not their religion, as if afraid that if they were to ask a few questions and inquire within they would go to hell.

God is not about fear, it is not about separation, it is not about judgment. At least not the God I have experienced (read me well,
experienced, not believed in). This Divine being is about Love and Truth and Union.

Interestingly if some of these people locked in their boxes were to do a little research on how religions came about, they would be surprised to see that what they belief is a result of years and years of transformation and that some of the most important religions actually originate in the same principles and ideas. It is only the workings of time (and perhaps political, social and or economical interests) that have made them what they are now.

I am not an expert here, but I remember reading about the origins of Catholicism and was baffled to see how much beauty there was back then. Esoteric Christianity, phew... and so on. I used to be so critical about Catholicism, rejecting absolutely everything there is about it, until I did my research. I think the form it has taken now is so distant from its original essence. Same probably for most dogmatic religions that ask people to have faith in something that they can't even experience themselves.

The art of things becoming corrupted. Well, not really an art.

Furthermore... a quote

“We are like a choir who stand round the conductor,” says Plotinus, “but do not always sing in tune, because their attention is diverted by looking at external things. So we always move round the One—if we did not, we should dissolve and cease to exist—but we do not always look towards the One.” Hence, instead of that free and conscious co-operation in the great life of the All which alone can make personal life worth living, we move like slaves or marionettes, and, oblivious of the whole to which our little steps contribute, fail to observe the measure “whereto the worlds keep time.” Our minds being distracted from the Corypheus in the midst the “energetic Word” who sets the rhythm, we do not behold Him. We are absorbed in the illusions of sense; the “eye which looks on Eternity” is idle. “But when we do behold Him,” says Plotinus again, “we attain the end of our existence and our rest. Then we no longer sing out of tune, but form a truly divine chorus about Him; in the which chorus dance the soul beholds the Fountain of life 234 the Fountain of intellect, the Principle of Being, the cause of good the root of soul.”

From the fantastic book by Evelyn Underhill :
Mysticism: A Study in Nature and Development of Spiritual Consciousness

Your belief becomes _your_ reality. Not _the_ reality.

Let this be the first real post.

Among the many musings that I have there is one that has been very present today.

I often think about how people's beliefs create their reality. What sort of beliefs? All sorts: religious, financial, cultural,... you name it.

I was born in a country that was somewhat forced to adopt Catholicism as the way to relate to the Divine (God, That, or whatever you want to call it). Having had always a sense of 'a something else' a lot of the times I was taken to church by my parents (backed by a very Catholic grandfather) I was bored, and amused at the same time. My amusement came not from the sermons that the priest would call, neither from the sense of being in a holy place. In fact, it was very much the opposite. I found the words empty, the people around me hypocrites and pretenders and I just couldn't understand why they would hit their hearts three times saying "I am guilty' ("guilty of what?" I thought... "I am not guilty of anything, don't count me in!"). These visits felt heavy and gray. My concept of something else was very different, so different that I would never had thought that
perhaps some of my experiences could be considered divine.

Memorable moments were those during the night in which I would wake up in my room, to the most sublime silence (to whatever extent one can understand the concept of sublime as a child) and the most beautiful light and sound with it (yes, silence can have sound of a very different type). It would hold me deeply and I would soon fall back asleep. There was lightness, joy, and something that felt open and fluid - very different to the heavy, gray, limiting aspects that Catholicism represented to me.

And so I grew up, became quite cynical, forgot about the blessed moments of awe and wonder and existentialism took over. A complete questioning of every aspect of my life. Who am I? What do I want? And so on... It was only later, perhaps as a result of that intense questioning, that I started to reconnect back with those heart-warming experiences that I felt as a child and denied as a teenager. It was a long journey - it still is, and I am very grateful for it.

So, what does this have to do with people's beliefs and reality? Well, I look around and see people (and myself in the mirror) so caught in their religious 'shoulds', their financial 'worries', their
social 'fears', and many, many more... Ideas that are only mental and conditioned, followed because of the society, the group, what the media says, what has been done before should be, what the perceived limit is. Many of these rarely come as a result of the true essence of the person shining through. Ideas that limit people instead of opening the doors of freedom, the real freedom.

Think about it. What would society become if at least half of the population created their reality based on their highest, innermost being? People that instead of listening to the bs sensationalism generated by the media could see that there are other ways, other means and that by choosing to fall into the bunch they are becoming it? The beliefs
create their reality.

Now pushing this further. Beliefs will never be reality itself. To know reality one has to have the experience of it. By reality I mean what is beyond appearances, that which has to do more with the inside than the outside.

No, don't get me wrong... there is a world out there.
There are cars and houses, and pennies and dollars and euros, and oceans and trees and human bodies. It is NOT an illusion. The illusion is what we make out of these things, what we believe these to be. What if we could really wake up and see things for what they are? Can you imagine the type of world we could actually build? The social, financial, political... systems? (Or call them whatever you want.)


Just spare with me for a moment here.... OMG!

Perhaps for many these are ramblings of an idealist... and that is ok. You can choose your beliefs (or probably more something like let your beliefs choose you.) What I choose is not to believe, but to experience. This means a possibility, a possibility of creating a reality, with the physical means that will actually support the core of being human and not deny it. Or at least that is my goal. And no, I am not looking for another theory or another set of beliefs. I want to be able to create, to whatever extent possible giving the reality of the physical existence, something that holds That.

Can this be possible? Somewhere inside I know it is (just don't ask me how just yet).

Those brief moments of silence experienced as a child were more real than any sermons given in the church. They conveyed something that felt more True at least to me. Something was alive and that something was not imposed. There were no beliefs, no doctrine, no dogma, only experience. In a way, one needs not to talk about religion to find similar things. The speeches of politicians, the disinformation of the media, the trends generated by the materialistic approach, these can be for a lot of people doctrines and dogmas, only sometimes the preacher or priest is more difficult to spot.

Let me be clear, what I am suggesting here is not the fact that everything you believe is real. Or that by constantly repeating affirmations you will magically materialize a pet, or a house, or a million in your account. Those to me are beliefs too and I don't follow the Secret's style of life. Au contraire, what you believe is not necessarily the reality, but your reality. Things in this world are something, regardless of what you believe they are. The key is to see things for what they are, beyond their appearance. And then create with those real ingredients that which will bring you closer to you.

So what if the experience is painful? How painful, I would ask. Is it really painful or is it a belief on top of the pain that makes it a suffering? Not all experiences in this world are pretty. For sure. However, how many times do we believe that these are horrible? Experiences are experiences. What we put on top of them is a different thing. And there are experiences that will bring you closer to you and others that will separate you from you. But only you will know which are these. They do not follow a set of rules, or doctrines and they are far beyond the judgmental noise of the mind.

In a world of growing confusion and ignorance, the key lies in the silence, where no belief exist and just existence is.

Quoting Thomas Keating* "God's first language is Silence. Everything else is a translation."

(*who incidentally is a monk from a strict Catholic order)